marrowgate · August 18, 2026
Eleven Pages Missing From the March Minutes
The Marrowgate Planning Board voted on the Harbourside rezoning in March. The minutes of that night jump from page 41 to page 52, and nobody at City Hall can say where the rest went.

The binder sits on a shelf in the clerk's office on the second floor of Marrowgate City Hall, spine out, blue cloth, a strip of masking tape across the top that reads PLANNING BOARD 2026. I turned its pages for forty minutes on a Tuesday. Page 41 ends in the middle of a sentence. Page 52 begins with somebody saying thank you.
Eleven pages. That is what's missing, and the eleven cover the part of the March 12 meeting where the Planning Board voted to rezone four acres of the Harbourside from "working waterfront" to "mixed use".
What the clerk told us
The clerk is a courteous man who asked me to describe him as exactly that. He said the binder had been "through a lot." The basement flooded in April. Some papers were moved, some dried, some "reconstituted". He did not say the pages were destroyed. He said they were not currently located.
I asked who had last handled the March minutes. He went to find the sign-out sheet. There was a sign-out sheet for February and one for April. The March page of the log had been cut out along the spine, neatly, with something sharp.
He looked at it for a while. Then he offered me a cup of tea, which I took, because you don't turn down tea in a room like that.
What the other record says
Minutes are not the only memory a city keeps. The Planning Board streams its sessions to a video archive, and the March 12 recording exists. It runs three hours and nine minutes. At the two-hour-ten mark the audio stops for four minutes (a technician's note in the archive calls it "a routine encoder restart") and comes back with the chair calling a vote.
So there is a paper gap and a recording gap, and they line up to within a few minutes of each other. Coincidences happen. A city that loses its own records in two formats on one evening is either unlucky or tidy. We don't yet know which.
The people who would know
Four board members voted that night. Three did not return calls placed over eight days. The fourth, Tobias Rennick, picked up on the second ring and said the vote had been "procedurally ordinary." I asked him what he remembered about the debate. He said it had been a long meeting.
I asked about the four-minute silence on the tape. There was a pause on the line, the kind you can hear someone choosing a sentence in.
"I couldn't tell you what the equipment does," he said.
The binder is not lost. A lost thing is a thing nobody wanted.
That is not a quotation from anyone. It is what I wrote in my notebook in the stairwell afterward, and I'm leaving it here because it's the thing I believe so far.
What happens next
We have filed a records request for the sign-out logs, the archive's server records for the night of March 12, and the clerk's own email for the week that followed. How we worded it, and why each line is there, is set out in our note on records requests. Marrowgate's ordinance gives the clerk ten working days to answer.
We will be counting.
Names, places and events in this demo are fictional.
No comments yet
Comments are open. Have a thought or a question? Share it below.